Freedom of Religion, Not Freedom from Religion - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Freedom of Religion, Not Freedom from Religion

A criticism I often hear of Christians is that we are so “sheltered.” Public opinion today seems to associate Christianity with narrow-mindedness, intolerance, or a fear of new ideas. So I find it rather confusing that organizations like the Freedom from Religion Foundation feel the need to intervene in public schools across the country, regardless of whether there were any complaints, in order to make sure students are not allowed to hear any perspective on religious belief besides the nontheism they advocate.

The Baylor Lariat’s editorial (“‘Chaplain’ title not vital to minister,” Sept. 5) told the story of Pastor Troy Schmidt, a volunteer chaplain for Olympia High School in Florida. The foundation sent a letter to the school district complaining about Schmidt’s spiritual counseling of players on the team. The foundation says it wants to protect students from a volunteer chaplain who apparently wants to “force [his] religion onto other people’s children.” This is a gross misrepresentation of the truth. There is no evidence that Schmidt was trying to force students to believe anything.

“The only question any of us should be asking is about what is best for the children,” says the Lariat editorial. I agree. Was it best to shelter the children from any perspective on religion other than the nontheistic viewpoint the foundation claims to promote? And the foundation is doing nothing to help the welfare of the children by changing the title of “chaplain” to “life coach.”

The mission of the foundation is quite clear—to promote nontheism. But it appears they also want to ridicule Christians. On the “Open Letter to Troy Schmidt” found on their website, they post an old picture of Pastor Schmidt with a controversial rock star, with no apparent purpose other than to make him look bad. The organization continuously refers to their views as “freethought”—implying that the religious are not able to think freely for themselves.

The legal analysis is as equally questionable as the personal attacks. The foundation’s letter to the school district repeatedly refers to Schmidt’s actions as an “unconstitutional endorsement of religion.” But looking at the actual Constitution tells a different story. The First Amendment says clearly, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” This phrase has been interpreted to apply to school districts (not just Congress) by a slew of recent Supreme Court decisions expanding the definition of “separation of church and state.”

The phrase “separation of church and state” first gained legal power in 1947, when Justice Hugo Black wrote the Supreme Court’s opinion in Everson v. Board of Education. Justice Black relied not on the Constitution’s words but on a quote by Thomas Jefferson about a “wall of separation between church and state.”

But if Jefferson had actually intended the reference to a wall to prohibit any government influence whatsoever in religion, why did he support using federal funds to build churches and support missionaries to the Indians? Why did he propose bills as a state legislator in Virginia to support a public day of prayer?

The idea that school-district volunteers were included in reference to the Congress in the Constitution’s language is quite a stretch. All fifty state constitutions still mention God. Does that mean every state is violating the First Amendment and “forcing religion” upon its citizens? Many, if not most, would argue no.

Prohibiting school volunteers from mentioning God is a victory for the proponents of nontheism, but the foundation fails to realize that promoting nontheism in schools is to put forward their own theory of religion—that it is not worth discussing.

Some of my teachers often advocated for a specific perspective on history, science, or politics that I did not agree with. But rather than suing them, I allowed their different ideas to inform my reasoning and enhance my critical thinking. The Freedom from Religion Foundation, however, argues that no one remotely affiliated with a public school should be allowed to disagree with the nontheistic viewpoint.

And we’re supposed to think that Christians are sheltered?

Get the Collegiate Experience You Hunger For

Your time at college is too important to get a shallow education in which viewpoints are shut out and rigorous discussion is shut down.

Explore intellectual conservatism
Join a vibrant community of students and scholars
Defend your principles

Join the ISI community. Membership is free.

You might also like